数据集:
health_fact
任务:
文本分类语言:
en计算机处理:
monolingual大小:
10K<n<100K语言创建人:
found批注创建人:
expert-generated源数据集:
original预印本库:
arxiv:2010.09926许可:
mitPUBHEALTH is a comprehensive dataset for explainable automated fact-checking of public health claims. Each instance in the PUBHEALTH dataset has an associated veracity label (true, false, unproven, mixture). Furthermore each instance in the dataset has an explanation text field. The explanation is a justification for which the claim has been assigned a particular veracity label.
[More Information Needed]
The text in the dataset is in English.
The following is an example instance of the PUBHEALTH dataset:
Field | Example |
---|---|
claim | Expired boxes of cake and pancake mix are dangerously toxic. |
explanation | What's True: Pancake and cake mixes that contain mold can cause life-threatening allergic reactions. What's False: Pancake and cake mixes that have passed their expiration dates are not inherently dangerous to ordinarily healthy people, and the yeast in packaged baking products does not "over time develops spores." |
label | mixture |
author(s) | David Mikkelson |
date published | April 19, 2006 |
tags | food, allergies, baking, cake |
main_text | In April 2006, the experience of a 14-year-old who had eaten pancakes made from a mix that had gone moldy was described in the popular newspaper column Dear Abby. The account has since been circulated widely on the Internet as scores of concerned homemakers ponder the safety of the pancake and other baking mixes lurking in their larders [...] |
evidence sources | [1] Bennett, Allan and Kim Collins. “An Unusual Case of Anaphylaxis: Mold in Pancake Mix.” American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology. September 2001 (pp. 292-295). [2] Phillips, Jeanne. “Dear Abby.” 14 April 2006 [syndicated column]. |
Mentioned above in data instances.
# Instances | |
---|---|
train.tsv | 9832 |
dev.tsv | 1221 |
test.tsv | 1235 |
total | 12288 |
The dataset was created to explore fact-checking of difficult to verify claims i.e., those which require expertise from outside of the journalistics domain, in this case biomedical and public health expertise.
It was also created in response to the lack of fact-checking datasets which provide gold standard natural language explanations for verdicts/labels.
The dataset was retrieved from the following fact-checking, news reviews and news websites:
URL | Type |
---|---|
http://snopes.com/ | fact-checking |
http://politifact.com/ | fact-checking |
http://truthorfiction.com/ | fact-checking |
https://www.factcheck.org/ | fact-checking |
https://fullfact.org/ | fact-checking |
https://apnews.com/ | news |
https://uk.reuters.com/ | news |
https://www.healthnewsreview.org/ | health news review |
[More Information Needed]
[More Information Needed]
Who are the annotators?[More Information Needed]
Not to our knowledge, but if it is brought to our attention that we are mistaken we will make the appropriate corrections to the dataset.
[More Information Needed]
[More Information Needed]
[More Information Needed]
The dataset was created by Neema Kotonya, and Francesca Toni, for their research paper "Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims" presented at EMNLP 2020.
MIT License
@inproceedings{kotonya-toni-2020-explainable, title = "Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims", author = "Kotonya, Neema and Toni, Francesca", booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)", month = nov, year = "2020", address = "Online", publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", url = "https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.emnlp-main.623", pages = "7740--7754", }
Thanks to @bhavitvyamalik for adding this dataset.