https://github.com/dwslab/StArCon

@inproceedings{kobbe-etal-2020-unsupervised,
    title = "Unsupervised stance detection for arguments from consequences",
    author = "Kobbe, Jonathan  and
      Hulpu{\textcommabelow{s}}, Ioana  and
      Stuckenschmidt, Heiner",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)",
    month = nov,
    year = "2020",
    address = "Online",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-main.4",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.4",
    pages = "50--60",
    abstract = "Social media platforms have become an essential venue for online deliberation where users discuss arguments, debate, and form opinions. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised method to detect the stance of argumentative claims with respect to a topic. Most related work focuses on topic-specific supervised models that need to be trained for every emergent debate topic. To address this limitation, we propose a topic independent approach that focuses on a frequently encountered class of arguments, specifically, on arguments from consequences. We do this by extracting the effects that claims refer to, and proposing a means for inferring if the effect is a good or bad consequence. Our experiments provide promising results that are comparable to, and in particular regards even outperform BERT. Furthermore, we publish a novel dataset of arguments relating to consequences, annotated with Amazon Mechanical Turk.",
}

https://github.com/dwslab/StArCon

@inproceedings{kobbe-etal-2020-unsupervised,
    title = "Unsupervised stance detection for arguments from consequences",
    author = "Kobbe, Jonathan  and
      Hulpu{\textcommabelow{s}}, Ioana  and
      Stuckenschmidt, Heiner",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)",
    month = nov,
    year = "2020",
    address = "Online",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-main.4",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.4",
    pages = "50--60",
    abstract = "Social media platforms have become an essential venue for online deliberation where users discuss arguments, debate, and form opinions. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised method to detect the stance of argumentative claims with respect to a topic. Most related work focuses on topic-specific supervised models that need to be trained for every emergent debate topic. To address this limitation, we propose a topic independent approach that focuses on a frequently encountered class of arguments, specifically, on arguments from consequences. We do this by extracting the effects that claims refer to, and proposing a means for inferring if the effect is a good or bad consequence. Our experiments provide promising results that are comparable to, and in particular regards even outperform BERT. Furthermore, we publish a novel dataset of arguments relating to consequences, annotated with Amazon Mechanical Turk.",
}